Construction Management - Public Information | Johnson County Community College

The CMGT Construction Management program produces graduates who can manage projects from start to finish by developing skills in areas like creating project schedules, estimating costs, ensuring safety and quality control. These programs also focus on teaching students to apply technology, manage teams, understand sustainable practices, and ethical considerations in construction.

Project management and planning

Create project schedules, cost estimates, and bids.
Manage project control processes, including budgeting, scheduling, and resource allocation.
Apply knowledge of construction methods, materials, and equipment.

Technical and analytical skills

Analyze construction documents, blueprints, and Building Information Modeling (BIM) use.
Perform surveying and site layout
Use electronic-based technology for project management and communication.

Leadership and communication

Communicate effectively in both written and oral formats.
Manage and lead people, coordinate resources, and work in multidisciplinary teams and areanas.
Oversee project safety and develop safety plans.

Business knowledge

Navigate legal implications of contracts and regulations
Understand construction accounting and cost control methods..
Address ethical considerations in decision-making.

Quality Control and Sustainability

Understand basic principles of sustainable construction.
Apply quality assurance and control measures to projects.

Career

Field & Project Engineer, Estimator, Scheduler, Superintendent, Project Manager, Project Coordinator, Quality Control Facilitator, Safety Manager, and Facilities Manager

Visit the Construction Management academic program page.

Visit the Construction Management Technology, AAS catalog page.

Overview:

The Construction Management program strategic plan was developed to both complement the over-all JCCC strategic plan and to serve our construction industry to provide high quality, educated work ready individuals.

Mission:

JCCC inspires learning to transform lives and strengthen communities.

The Construction Management program aims to provide excellence in teaching, producing high quality individuals that are ready to go to work upon graduation.

Vision:

JCCC will be an innovative leader in equitable student access, learning and success.

The Construction Management program aims to be the construction educator of choice, providing economical education, with cutting edge technology and teaching to produce “work-ready” individuals to serve the construction industry.

Values:

JCCC:

Student-Centered — We promote an environment that shows the deepest care and support for the learning and growth of our students.
Teaching and Learning — We believe life-long learning is central to enriching the lives of our students, faculty, staff, and community for success in a global society.
Community Engagement — We value our role as the community's college and commit ourselves to partnerships that respond to the changing needs of those we serve.
Innovation — We foster an environment of excellence by intentionally seeking new and creative ways to meet the needs of our students, colleagues, and community.
Belonging — We value diversity, equity, and inclusion, creating a collaborative and respectful environment where all are connected to our mission.
Integrity — We hold ourselves accountable for our decisions and actions.

Construction Management:

Students –- students are our number 1 priority. We put them first in all decision making.
Engaging – we focus on energizing the students. We focus on teaching in an interesting way, both visually and through practical means.
Education – we teach from an industry perspective, what is most practical in our industry to prepare them ready to go into the construction industry. (Hands-on training)
Industry Leaders –- we involve construction industry professionals with the program and students with industry professionals.
Inclusion – we look to provide a diverse work force from all walks of life, and backgrounds.

Strategic Goals:

JCCC:

Student Success: Support learners in achieving their educational goals.
Community Partnerships: Advance diverse and strategic partnerships.
Employee Engagement: Strengthen employee engagement.

Construction Management

Growth- 5-year plan to increase program size to 75 students. (min. 10% per year) By 2028
Partnering:
- Expand network of contractors- west of KC (Ks); Missouri (500 count by 2028)
- Expand High School base- Kansas (Desoto; Gardner; Spring Hill; etc.); Missouri (Liberty; Lee Summit; etc. Six by 2028
- Expand 4 year ACCE Accredited base. Current reciprocal base: Dunwoody; Central Missouri. Include Pittsburg State; Kansas State; Fort Hays State; etc. By 2025
- Organizations- AGC of Kansas; Builders; ABC; CSI; ASPE; other
- Former Students- mentoring; CMP and classroom guest speaking
Work Ready- accelerate learning with established partners for Internships
Diversity- 30% women; 15% BIPOC; 10% Veteran; 5% International (By 2028)
Integrity- incorporate additional ethics into each class. (By 2023 / 2024)
Outside Learning- require Internships; Min. of 6 job tours / year; set us job shadowing; Toastmasters; World of Concrete; CSI events; AGC events, etc. 2023 / 2024
Models- building envelope, concrete, masonry (hands on experience in learning) 2023
CMP- increase student participation to 25% by 2023 / 2024
“Goodwill”- Can Competition; Hope House; Tiny Houses (Vets); Rebuilding Together; other (2023-2028)
Lab- complete build out (2025)
Career Fair- 90% participation (2023 / 2024)
Advisory Board- diversity in trade; count- dozen (2023 / 2024)

Technology / Instrument / Outside Competencies

Procore (2023)
Microsoft Project / P6 (2022 / 2023)
Bluebeam (2025)
Oracle (2028)
3D Camera’s (2023 / 2024)
EL-1 (2023 / 2024)
Predictive Index / NSight (2023 / 2024)
PMG Scheduler
Expertise- survey; earthwork; concrete; masonry; steel; carpentry; MEP

Some examples of: Public Information related to JCCC and CMP- Mission, Vision, Program:

The quality assessment plan considers many factors to determine if the department is successfully meeting its mission and that of the college. The input data includes recommendations, program need, student performance, effectiveness of the curriculum and instruction, level of satisfaction with the program and adequacy of program resources.

Recommendations are accepted anytime and in any form. The program faculty and administration are always willing to accept helpful advice. If the Department Chair thinks it is a helpful recommendation, they will present it first to administration and later to the Industry Advisory Board (IAB).

Program needs are varied and ever changing. The needs of this program can be determined by both conventional (surveys, SLOs etc.) and unconventional (recommendations) approaches. It is the Program Coordinators responsibility to ensure that program needs are being met.

Student performance is measured by evaluation of student learning outcomes (SLOs) at the end of each semester within each class. The department uses an evaluation scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = Does Not Meet Expectations and 5 = Exceeds Expectations of the SLOs. The evaluations start by recording the student understanding of each outcome (on a scale of 1-5) within a course by its instructor. Outcome averages are assembled by the Department Chair from every course to determine overall student/department performance each year. All classes are currently conducted via “Canvas” website and the assessment within it.

Effectiveness of the curriculum and instruction are evaluated using student and graduate surveys that are used to gather information helpful to the department's performance and growth. Please note the survey assessment chart below for type and frequency of evaluation.

Level of satisfaction with the program is gauged using course assessments. Surveys are given and managed by the college to all students at the end of each course. The college makes this information available to administration, Program Coordinator, and instructors.

Adequacy of program resources are evaluated using administrative and faculty input gained though informal conversations, current student surveys, graduate surveys and employer surveys. Please note the survey assessment chart below for type and frequency of evaluation.

Program Review Summary Reports - (Construction Management is under Civil Engineering Technology)

Program outlook summaries (based on follow-up survey) are posted on department’s program pages. Note, the salary data on outlook provides median vs. average.

Program Outlook Summaries - (based on follow-up survey) are posted on department’s program pages. Note, the salary data on outlook provides median vs. average.

JCCC Degrees and Certificates awarded by Academic Year

Identify Student Learning Outcomes:
Student Learning outcomes (SLOs) were first developed within the Construction Management department. The Department Chair and the department faculty developed the SLOs for each course. SLOs are revised accordingly to meet changing industry demands. ACCE program outcomes were implemented Fall 2020.
Get Input:
SLOs for each class are reviewed by the Department Chair and instructor each semester. SLOs are also presented to the Industry Advisory Board (IAB) periodically in an effort to gather information to improve the department.
Specify Assessment Process:
Student performance is measured by evaluation of student learning outcomes (SLOs) at the end of each semester within each class. The department uses an evaluation scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = Does Not Meet Expectations and 5 = Exceeds Expectations of SLOs. The evaluation process starts by recording the students understanding of each outcome (on a scale of 1-5) within a course by its instructor. Outcome averages are assembled by the Department Chair from every course to determine overall student/department performance each year. Outcome averages less than 3 will trigger changes in the course. Averages of 3 or above will be considered adequate and will require no change in the course.

Student Performance Calculation Example:

ACCE #9, Fundamentals- Contracts, Codes, and Regulations

Identify the fundamentals of contracts, codes and regulations that govern a construction project.

Exceeds Expectations	Meets Expectations	Does Not Meet Expectations
5 Points	3 Points	0 Points

Set mastery for any score at or above: 60%

Calculation Method:

65/35 Decaying Average

Most recent result counts as 65% of mastery weight, average

Example:

Example item scores:

1, 4, 2, 3, 5, 3, 6

Example final score:

4.95

ACCE program outcomes are evaluated by a minimum percentage of students obtaining a target level of performance on each direct assessment. Adequate performance is considered achieved on the direct assessment when seventy percent of the students obtain a target level of seventy percent. Changes to the program is required when less than seventy percent of the student achieve the target level. Adequate performance is considered achieved on the indirect assessment when seventy percent of the students obtain a target level of three on their average of their student learning outcomes for the course. No change is required if seventy percent of the students achieve the target level.

Collect and Analyze the Data:
The SLO data is collected at the end of each semester from each class. The instructor for each course is responsible for submitting their outcomes assessment forms to the Department Chair for review. Each year the Department Chair reviews and analyzes the results. Each instructor will report the results of all direct assessments in their courses to the Program Coordinator.

Additionally, instructors will provide a graded example of the direct assessment and any associated grading rubric to the Program Coordinator.
Share the Results:
The course SLO data and ACCE program outcome data is presented to the IAB. All changes and recommendations will be implemented within the next assessment cycle.
Make Changes:
The department uses an evaluation scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = Does Not Meet Expectations and 5 = Exceeds Expectations of SLOs. Outcome averages less than 3 will trigger changes in the course. Averages of 3 or above will be considered adequate and will require no change in the course. All changes will be noted.

The department requires performance criteria of a minimum percentage of students obtaining a target level of performance on each direct assessment. Adequate performance is considered achieved on the direct assessment when seventy percent of the students obtain a target level of seventy percent. Lower performance will require adjustments to the program. Adequate performance is considered achieved on the indirect assessment when seventy percent of the students obtain a target level of three on their average of their student learning outcomes for the course. No change is required if seventy percent of the students achieve the target level. All changes will be noted.

Annual Summary Report of Achievement of Student Learning Outcomes and Degree Program Objectives

As prescribed in Section 8.5.1 and 9.4.1 of ACCE Document 103, Standards and Criteria for the Accreditation of Construction Education Programs

2023 2024	Academic Year	Degree Level	Associate	Program Name		Construction Management Technology	Institution Name		Johnson County Community College

Student Learning Outcome		Method of Assessment		Current Evaluation of Results and Resulting Corrective Actions			Last Reported Evaluation of Results and Follow-up on the impact of corrective actions taken				Description of any revisions made to Degree Program assessment tools
SLO #	SLO Description			Current Evaluation	Dates of evaluation	Corrective Actions	Last Evaluation	Dates of Last Evaluation	Follow-up of the impact of corrective actions taken	Date(s) of Follow-up
#0	Sample of feedback for Student Learning Outcomes	CONST XXX - Principles of Effective Construction Communications	Direct	Describe the results of the evaluation - example - "Meeting the targeted objective."	May-24	Review the technical writing course for content and rigor.	Not meeting target	5/1/2022	Meeting with industry in AY2022 to discuss student's writing skills did not yield positive impact on writing skills.	8/1/2023	Made adjustments to the curriculum to incorporate the feedback received from our industry meeting that was held in AY2022.
#0	Sample of feedback for Student Learning Outcomes	Senior survey	Assessment Type	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#1	Apply effective communication, both orally and in writing.	CMGT 123- Bldg Codes; 125 Constr. Specifications; 129 Constr Mgmt; 140 CE Mat.; 160 Green Bldg; 227 Est	Direct	Each oral and written report are evaluated and meet target	23-May	Continue to review content.	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Each Senior performs a survey on their expectation being met.	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#1	Apply effective communication, both orally and in writing.	In each class give written and oral reports that are graded	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#2	Apply quantity takeoff skills for bidding or budgeting purposes on a construction project.	CMGT129- Constr Mgmt; 160 Green Bldg; 227 Constr Cost Est; 229 Adv.Constr Mgmt	Direct	In each of these classes student learn the processes involved with construction project and estimating quantities.	23-May	Continue to review content.	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Each Senior performs a survey on their expectation being met.	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#2		Testing	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#3	Apply the aptitude to schedule a basic construction project.	CMGT 129- Constr Mgmt; 160 Green Building;	Direct	In CMGT 129 they learn MP and do several project; In 160 they prepare schedule for semester project	23-May	In addition to reviewing content, have a guest scheduler train and elective on MP.	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Feedback from Advisory Board on students employed on progress and software. Encouraged elective to learn more on Microsoft Project Scheduling	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#3		Testing/Rubric	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#4	Apply current technology related to the construction industry.	CMGT 123 Bldg. Code; 125 Constr. Spec; 129 Contr. Mgmt; 160 Green Bldg.	Direct	We continue to expose new technology in these classes. In part from our Adv. Board and in part due to activeness in the Industry. (eg Procore; MP; RS Means; 3-D Camera; Drone, etc.)	23-May	Continue with proactive approach to new technology	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Looking at expansion of our Program in latest survey technology.	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#4		Survey. And testing of knowledge	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		Survey technolgy	N/A	None needed at this time.
#5	Apply the interpretation of construction documents (contracts, specifications, and drawings) used in managing a construction project.	CMGT 123- Bldg Codes; 129 Constr. Mgmt; 160 Green Bldg	Direct	Within the courses we test on the process, documents and understanding, application in semester project.	23-May	Continue to review content.	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Each Senior performs a survey on their expectation being met.	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#5		Heavy testing on constr. Doc's	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#6	Apply basic principles of construction accounting.	CMGT 129 Constr. Mgmt; 160 Green Bldg	Direct	Both teaching principles and applicaton of those principals are evaluated	23-May	We continue to amend work session on use of accounting principles	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Continue to req. Accounting class and use within the program I practical exercises.	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#6	Apply basic principles of construction accounting.	Exercises evaluated and testing	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#7	Apply basic surveying techniques used in building layout.	CMGT 105 Constr Methods; 129 Constr Mgmt; 205 Adv. Constr Methods	Direct	Students go out and perform exercises that are evaluated and written testing	23-May	Continue to ramp up training and consideration of separate sole class on survey	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Looking to add a class exclusive for surveying with Adv. Board support and industry.	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#7	Apply basic surveying techniques used in building layout.	Both field exercised evaluated and testing	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		Starting addition process	N/A	None needed at this time.
#8	Understand basic principles of ethics in the construction industry.	CMGT 105- Constr Methods; 125 Constr Specifications; 129 Constr Mgmt; 229 Adv Constr Mgmt	Direct	In each class we assign examples of ethical challenges in our industry. Estimating being the most likely benefited class	23-May	Continue to bring in outside industry for perspective	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Focus group to align ethic requirements in each class	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#8		Focal point in all our classes, but hard to grade vs challenging students	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#9	Understand the fundamentals of contracts, codes, and regulations that govern a construction project.	CMGT 105 Constr Methods; 123 Bldg Codes; 129 Constr Mgmt; 160 Green Bldg; 205 Adv Constr Methods	Direct	Both Mgmt Classes focus on contracts and in Bldge Codes is exclusive on code req.	23-May	Bring in more contractual updates, systems, and latest IBC codes instituted into our cities.	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Continue to upgrade codes as cities upgrade.	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#9		Testing	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#10	Understand basic construction methods and materials.	CMGT 105 Constr Methods; 123 Bldg Codes; 129 Constr Mgmt; 160 Green Bldg; 205 Adv Constr Methods	Direct	Continue to evaluate new and methods and technology	23-May	Continue to review content.	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Review with Advisory Board	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#10	Understand basic construction methods and materials.	Testing	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#11	Understand basic safety hazards on a construction site and standard prevention measures.	CMGT 105 Constr Methods; 123 Bldg Codes; 129 Constr Mgmt; 150 Constr Safety	Direct	150 Safety teaches directly the current OSHA standards and issuance of OSHA 30 card; the rest of the classes listed apply these standards	23-May	Continue to update as OSHA updates and Industry	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Continue with latest OSHA standards	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#11		Testing	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#12	Understand the basic principles of structural design.	CMGT 105 Constr Methods; 123 Bldg Codes; 129 Constr Mgmt; 140 CE Materials	Direct	Use of processes and example- positve and negative	23-May	Use of outside speakers and seminars	First evaluation	5/1/2022	More input from Advisory Board	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#12	Understand the basic principles of structural design.	Process tested	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#13	Understand the basic principles of mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems	CMGT 105- Constr Methods; 123 Bldg Codes; 160 Green Bldg	Direct	Use of understanding systems and productgs	23-May	Use of outside speakers	First evaluation	5/1/2022	Adv. Board recommendations on additonal guest speakers	5/23/2024	Each SLO is reviewed based on testing as well as survey comments.
#13		Testing	Assessment	Meeting target		None	Meeting target		None	N/A	None needed at this time.
#14	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Direct
#14	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Assessment
#15	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Direct
#15	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Assessment
#16	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Direct
#16	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Assessment
#17	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Direct
#17	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Assessment
#18	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Direct
#18	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Assessment
#19	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Direct
#19	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Assessment
#20	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Direct
#20	Additional Program Specific SLO if needed		Assessment

Degree Program Objectives		Assessment Tool		Current Evaluation of Results and Resulting Corrective Actions			Last Reported Evaluation of Results and Follow-up of the impact of corrective actions taken				Description of any revisions made to Degree Program assessment tools
DPO #	DPO Description	Method of Assessment	Direct or Indirect	Current Evaluation	Dates of evaluation	Corrective Actions	Last Evaluation	Dates of Last Evaluation	Follow-up of the impact of corrective actions taken	Date(s) of Follow-up
#0			Direct
#1			Direct
#2			Direct
#3			Direct
#4			Direct
#5			Direct
#6			Direct
#7			Direct
#8			Direct
#9			Direct
#10			Direct
#11			Direct
#12			Direct
#13			Direct
#14			Direct
#15			Direct
#16			Direct
#17			Direct
#18			Direct
#19			Direct
#20			Direct

This Policy addresses credit, continuing education/noncredit and international student admission at Johnson County Community College (JCCC or “College”).

Any person seeking regular admission to Johnson County Community College credit courses must satisfy one of the following requirements: be a high school graduate; be a concurrently enrolled high school student who meets the Kansas Board of Regents eligibility requirements; have passed the GED exam; or have reached the age of 18.

Refer to JCCC Admission Policy 310.01 for further information.

Apply effective communication, both orally and in writing.
Apply the skills to estimate quantities and costs for the bidding process in a construction project.
Apply the aptitude to schedule a basic construction project.
Apply current technology related to the construction process.
Apply the interpretation of construction documents (contracts, specifications, and drawings) used in managing a construction project.
Apply basic principles of construction accounting.
Apply basic surveying techniques used in building layout.
Understand basic principles of ethics in the construction industry.
Understand the fundamentals of contracts, codes, and regulations that govern a construction project.
Understand basic construction methods, materials and equipment.
Understand basic safety hazards on a construction site and standard prevention measures.
Understand the basic principles of structural design.
Understand the basic principles of mechanical, electrical and piping systems.

Annual Summary Report of Achievement of Student Learning Outcomes and Degree Program Objectives (.xlsx)

2023

^Courses	^{ACCE 1}	^{ACCE 2}	^{ACCE 3}	^{ACCE 4}	^{ACCE 5}	^{ACCE 6}	^{ACCE 7}	^{ACCE 8}	^{ACCE 9}	^{ACCE 10}	^{ACCE 11}	^{ACCE 12}	^{ACCE 13}
^{CMGT 105}							^3.65	^3.86	^3.46	^4.03	^3.96	⁴	^3.96
^{CMGT 123}	^3.97			^3.97	^3.97				⁴	^3.97	^3.97	^3.97	^3.97
^{CMGT 125}	^3.5			^3.5				^3.5	^3.5
^{CMGT 129}	⁴	^3.81	^3.9	^3.99	^4.01	^3.95	^3.87	⁴	^3.99	^3.99	⁴	^3.83
^{CMGT 140}	^3.67									^3.64	^3.64	^3.67
^{CMGT 150}											^4.8
^{CMGT 160}	^4.28	⁴			⁴	⁴			⁴	⁴			⁴
^{CMGT 160}	^3.78	^4.28	^4.28	^4.28	^4.28	^4.28			^4.28	^4.28			^4.28
^{CMGT 205}							^3.29			^3.37		^3.29
^{CMGT 225}
^{CMGT 227}		⁴	^3.98		⁴	⁴
^{CMGT 229}		^3.97	^3.95			^3.97		⁴	⁴		^3.91
^Totals:	^3.87	^4.01	^4.03	^3.94	^4.05	^4.04	^3.60	^3.84	^3.89	^3.90	^4.05	^3.75	^4.05

Date: 10/06/2025

2024

^Courses	^{ACCE 1}	^{ACCE 2}	^{ACCE 3}	^{ACCE 4}	^{ACCE 5}	^{ACCE 6}	^{ACCE 7}	^{ACCE 8}	^{ACCE 9}	^{ACCE 10}	^{ACCE 11}	^{ACCE 12}	^{ACCE 13}
^{CMGT 105}	³				^3.33		^3.82	^3.41	^3.57	⁴	^3.85	⁴	^3.98
^{CMGT 123}	⁴			^3.97	^3.97				⁴	^3.97	^3.97	^3.97	^3.97
^{CMGT 125}	^3.81			^4.01				^4.01	^4.01
^{CMGT 129}	^3.99	^3.84	^3.81	^3.98	^3.99	^3.98	^3.88	^3.99	^3.98	^3.96	^3.98	⁴
^{CMGT 140}	⁴									⁴		⁴
^{CMGT 150}											^4.4
^{CMGT 160}	⁴	⁴	⁴	⁴	⁴	⁴			⁴	⁴			⁴
^{CMGT 160}	⁴	^3.78	^3.78	^3.78	^3.78	^3.78			^3.78	^3.78			^3.78
^{CMGT 205}	^4.05						^4.05			^4.05		^4.05
^{CMGT 225}	^3.59			^3.4				^3.4	^3.4
^{CMGT 227}		^4.5
^{CMGT 229}									^3.4
^Totals:	^3.83	^4.03	^3.86	^3.86	^3.81	^3.92	^3.92	^3.70	^3.77	^3.97	^4.05	^4.00	^3.93

Date: 10/06/2025

2025 (partial)

^Courses	^{ACCE 1}	^{ACCE 2}	^{ACCE 3}	^{ACCE 4}	^{ACCE 5}	^{ACCE 6}	^{ACCE 7}	^{ACCE 8}	^{ACCE 9}	^{ACCE 10}	^{ACCE 11}	^{ACCE 12}	^{ACCE 13 - Understand the basic principles of mechanical, electrical, and piping systems.}
^{CMGT 105}							^3.06	^3.72		⁴		⁴
^{CMGT 123*}
^{CMGT 125*}
^{CMGT 129*}
^{CMGT 140}		^3.42	^3.83	^3.9	^4.01	^3.76	⁴	^3.98	^3.99	^3.89	⁴
^{CMGT 150}											^4.1
^{CMGT 160}	⁴	⁴	⁴	⁴	⁴	⁴			⁴	⁴			⁴
^{CMGT 160*}
^{CMGT 205}							⁴			⁴		⁴
^{CMGT 225}	⁴		^3.05	⁴				⁴
^{CMGT 227}		⁴	^3.59	^2.96	⁴	^3.98							⁴
^{CMGT 229}			^3.92					^3.27	^2.96	⁴	^3.58
^{Totals (Partial):}	^4.00	^3.81	^3.68	^3.72	^4.00	^3.91	^3.69	^3.74	^3.65	^3.98	^3.89	^4.00	^4.00

Number of Declared Primary Majors

			2021-2022	2022-2023	2023-2024	2024-2025	3Y +/-	3Y %
Construction Management	Cert	4750	37	30	34	49	12	32.4%
Construction Management Tech.	Assoc	2310	110	96	104	137	27	24.5%

Both primary and secondary majors looked at.
Source: JCCC EDW

Number of Degrees/Certificates Awarded by Academic Year

			2021-2022	2022-2023	2023-2024	2024-2025	3Y +/-	3Y %
Construction Management	Cert	4750	2	2	2	8	6	300.0%
Construction Management Tech.	Assoc	2310	14	15	8	12	-2	-14.3%

Source: JCCC EDW

Number of Graduates Transferring

			2020-2021	2021-2022	2022-2023	2023-2024	3Y +/-	3Y %
Construction Management	Cert	4750	0	2	1	1	1
Construction Management Tech.	Assoc	2310	0	2	2	3	3

Source: JCCC EDW & National Student Clearinghouse data

Percent of Graduates Employed in a Related Field

		2021-2022			2022-2023			2023-2024
		Survey Responses	Employed	% Employed	Survey Responses	Employed	% Employed	Survey Responses	Employed	% Employed
Construction Management Tech.	2310	9	7	78%	8	7	88%	6	4	67%
Construction Management	4750	1	1	100%	2	2	100%	2	1	50%

Placement rate based on percent of students responding to the OIPR Career Student Follow Up survey indicating they are working in a related field.

Source: JCCC ODS & OIPR Career Student Follow Up data (Note: the 2024-2025 Career Student Follow Up survey will be administered mid Fall 2025)

Source: Office of Institutional Planning and Research (OIPR); Oct 24, 2025

Job Titles of Construction Management Graduates
Assistant Project Engineer
Carpenter
Construction Manager
Engineer Inspector
Field Engineer
Field Superintendent
Independent Construction Contractor
Inspection Manager
Layout Manager
Lead Carpenter
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Publicworks Storm Water Maintenance Supervisor
Publicworks Supervisor
Residential Framer
Supervisor

Academic Years 2021-2024

1. JE Dunn	Project Engineer
2. Whiting Turner	Project Engineer
3. Terracon	Field Quality Control
4. Olsson	Commistioning Agent
5. SMH Consultants	Field Engineer
6. Dondlinger	Project Engineer
7. Faith Technologies	Operation Data
8. Black & Veach	Project Engineer
9. Kiewit	Project Engineer
10. Sorella Group	Project Engineer
11. Crossland	Field Engineer
12. Neighbors	Field Engineer
13. Lithko	Field Engineer
14. HME, Inc	Project Engineer
15. Universal	Contract Administer
16. George Butler	Project Engineer
17. Bottorff	Field Engineer
18. Henderson Building Solutions	Project Engineer
19. Architects Pacific Inc.	Operations
20. Henderson Engineering	Project Engineer
21. PAK Communication	Project Engineer
22. Miron Construction	Project Engineer
23. KAMO Construction	Field Engineer
24. PULLAN	Project Engineer
25. BHC	Project Engineer
26. Newirk Novak construction Partners	Field Engineer
27. T-Mac Construction	Estimating
28. Gunter	Estimating
29. CoMET	Project Engineer
30. Community Builder	Project Engineer
31. Mussleman & Hall Contractors	Project Engineer Coordinator
32. Harmon Construction, Inc.	Ass't Supt
33. Crookham Construction	Field Engineer

Job Titles of Construction Management Graduates
Assistant Project Engineer
Carpenter
Construction Manager
Engineer Inspector
Field Engineer
Field Superintendent
Independent Construction Contractor
Inspection Manager
Layout Manager
Lead Carpenter
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Publicworks Storm Water Maintenance Supervisor
Publicworks Supervisor
Residential Framer
Supervisor

Results of the most recent CET/CMGT* course evaluations from students.
*Note: The CET course prefix changed to CMGT.

CET/CGMT Evaluations 2021-2022

1=strongly disagree 5=strongly agree

Number of responses: 122

Course Structure

Item	Average score
Material is presented in a clear, logical manner.	4.3
The instructor provided a class syllabus.	4.8
The instructor followed the guidelines in the syllabus.	4.6
The instructor clearly communicates how grades are determined.	4.6

Class Environment

Item	Average score
The instructor creates an atmosphere conducive to learning.	4.6
The instructor encourages participation and questions.	4.7
The instructor treats students with respect.	4.8

Instructor Responsiveness

Item	Average score
The instructor grades assignments in a timely manner.	4.4
The instructor clearly communicates how I am doing in the course.	4.2
The instructor answers e-mail within a reasonable time (within 24 hours during the work week, for example).	4.7

Effectiveness

Item	Average score
Feedback from the instructor on my work helps me learn.	4.4
The instructor's method of teaching is effective.	4.2

Overall

Item	Average score
Overall evaluation of the instruction for this course.	4.4

Additional Questions

Item	Average score
The course contained practical information I can use.	4.7
Course textbook contained useful information.	4.6
I would recommend the course to others.	4.4
Instructor demonstrated knowledge of subject matter..	4.7
I would recommend this instructor to others.	4.5

Follow-up Survey of JCCC Program Completers

Academic Year 2019-2020 - All CTE Programs

Executive Summary

During the 2019-2020 academic year, JCCC awarded 3,329 degrees and certificates. Of the awards, 61% were associate’s degrees and 39% were certificates. For this reporting year, surveys were administered to 1,750 Career and Technical Education (CTE) graduates for evaluation of their career program. Liberal Arts & General Studies graduates were not surveyed.

Educational Objectives
Of the completers who responded to the follow-up survey, 92% indicated they had achieved their educational objective.

Licensing/Certification Exams
Ninety-eight percent of respondents who indicated they had taken a state licensing or industry credential exam reported they had passed.

Current Education
Thirty-six percent of graduates are continuing their education at JCCC or elsewhere.

Employment
Overall, 88% of respondents indicated they were employed. Of those graduates, 62% report working in a related field. The overall average hourly wage was $21.87.

Overall Rating of Program
Eighty-nine percent of respondents rated their career program as Excellent or Above Average.

Construction Management Completers: Employer Evaluations

Construction Management Completers: Employer Evaluations

As part of the annual career student follow-up survey, students working in a related field are asked to provide contact information of their current employers. Employers are then surveyed and asked to indicate their assessments of completers’ overall career preparation. Evaluations remain highly positive.

Note, that due to obstacles associated with Covid and a decline in responses from employers overall, the Office of Instituti

onal Planning & Research “paused” the administration of the employer follow-up survey. The employer follow-up survey will resume and be administered for programs requiring this information to meet their accreditation reporting needs/standards during the 2023-24 follow-up cycle.Employer Evaluation of Recent JCCC Graduates Employed in the Field

Five Year Overall (AY 2014 to 2018)

	Number of Responses	Good	Neutral	Poor	Five Year Mean
Job-related conceptual knowledge	9	100%	0%	0%	4.6
Job-related technical knowledge	9	78%	22%	0%	4.2
Attitude toward work (professionalism)	9	89%	11%	0%	4.8
Quality of work	9	89%	11%	0%	4.7
Communications and interpersonal skills	9	100%	0%	0%	4.4
Overall Job Preparation	9	100%	0%	0%	4.4

Note: Data were collected utilizing a 5-point scale ranging from very good (5) to very poor (1). Thus, the "good" column includes "very good" (5) and "good" (4) responses combined, and the "poor" column includes "poor" (2) and "very poor" (1) responses combined.

In what areas do you feel employees from this program are best prepared?
All.
General knowledge
Taking college coursework prepares people to successfully study subject matter and be successful when taking tests. This is helpful when seeking professional certification. They have a good understanding of the construction industry as a whole. Well informed in various areas.

In which areas do you feel additional preparation would be helpful?
Math.
None.
Public speaking/communication

2025 Advisory Committee Survey (PDF)

2024 Advsory Committee Survey (PDF)

2021/2022

Expand lab: Provide additional visuals to both stimulate and help the students better understand concepts (product samples; 3-D building envelope model).
Expand technology- Procore; Microsoft Project; Bluebeam; Predictive Index
Expand use of rubrics/student grading instructions/grading feedback/grading commentary
Expand SLOs into more of the courses.

2023/2024

Expand the Survey training. (Creating a separate class for Surveying, combining our Documents class with our Specifications class.) Working through the education requirements to make this change.
30% female and minorities in our program. (Maintain current pace at or near this requirement)
Look as program continues to expand to add staff.
Work to make classes more cohesive, building and transitioning between them.